A place where I sort out my thoughts, express my cynicism, or on occasionally just ramble like a psychopath.
Okay, so it seems that many of the rumours floating around about some of the new stipulations in the Windows Vsta EULA were nothing more than FUD. Originally everybody believed that your copy of Vista would allow you to upgrade your PC (i.e. swap the motherboard) once. Period. Apparently MS just released a statement that debunked that belief. A Microsoft spokesperson told bit-tech that the only upgrades that will force you to reactivate your copy of Vista would be those involving the hard drive and one other component. Anything else (video card, sound card, memory, CPU, PPU, whatever) would not require reactivation. Also, apparently you are allowed to reactivate *ten* times, not once like previously believed. Once your ten activations are up, you can call Microsoft as always and they will give you a new activation code if they don't think you're running multiple machines under the same key. Generally in my experience they just give you a code without any questions so long as your current key is not blacklisted. If they do, most likely the worst case scenario is they will ask you where you obtained your copy, and so long as your answer is not "The interweb" they will generally give you a new license for free if you narc on whoever provided you the pirated copy.

My question is what happens if you upgrade your video card and then add a supplementary hard drive? Will it be the case where as long as that original hard drive you installed Vista on in the first place is present, it won't make you reactivate? I'm sure that is probably the case, but I'm not certain. It will be interesting to see what happens to people who are running multiple hard drives, especially externals and hot-swappables. I am confident that Microsoft has though of this, though.

Comments
on Oct 26, 2006
Unfortunately reactivating Windows is the least of your worries when performing an upgrade (such as MB, CPU...etc) to your PC under Wuindows. A simple call to MS has always solved that issue for me in a very timely way.

When upgrading the major componants of your PC, you need to deal with the HAL, or better known as hal.dll (the Hardware Abstraction Layer). The HAL is a system critical file that helps Windows communicate with the devices on your system.

Due to the HALs intimate relationship between Windows and the hardware in your computer, the HAL can only be replaced either by doing a repair installation of Windows, via Setup.

This is a major pain in the neck and has not gotten any easier under Vista as I can tell.
on Oct 26, 2006

My question is what happens if you upgrade your video card and then add a supplementary hard drive?


I read an article somewhere quoting a Microsoft source as saying that the majority of hardware upgrades would have no affect on Vista: that replacing graphics/sound cards, adding a storage HD would not require reactivation. Generally, a repair using the installation disc will get Windows running properly after major hardware changes, so I'm inclined to think these reactivation concerns are largely propogated by MS competitors/media people with a boat to row.

I'm currently running Vista RC2 and recently upgraded my AMD 64 3200+ to an AMD 64x2 4600+/added a 200gig HD/stuck in another gig of RAM without issue....PC booted/runs okay, no need to do a repair install for Vista, XP Pro or XP Home (triple boot).


on Oct 27, 2006
I was testing upgrade scenarios yesterday and discovered that XP 32-bit will not upgrade to Vista 64-bit. But I have to admit I am not at all surprised by this. But I suspect there will be some users that are. By the way Vista 64 absolutely rocks on a Core 2 Duo at 2 Ghz, with 2 GB RAM and a gforce go 7600 at 256 MB.
on Oct 27, 2006
By the way Vista 64 absolutely rocks on a Core 2 Duo at 2 Ghz, with 2 GB RAM and a gforce go 7600 at 256 MB.


Thanks for that info! I might give the 64 bit version a try to weigh up the options before Vista goes gold....my machine has similar specs so should run it pretty well.
on Oct 27, 2006
re: #2/#3, above,
Now I'm suffering System Envy
[P4 1.4,512 RAMBUS RAM, ATI X700 PRO @ 128, Cr. SB Audigy(original)5.1, noisy extra loud extra fans, dust hares, superglue, cables front and back all over like seaweed, dog hairs, farts and bacon grease, lags and memory leaks, random obstinance, just good enough to not plunk down the moolah to build another...yet...today..well, this morning, anyway.]
Guess I'll run down to the local get-it-n-go for a couple of $5 lotto tickets, see if God wants me to have a new one yet...
Upgrade? Yep, it's time.
on Oct 27, 2006
I was testing upgrade scenarios yesterday and discovered that XP 32-bit will not upgrade to Vista 64-bit.


Upgrading is a crappy way to update your PC. It's always best to simply clean install. You'll be far happier in the end.

Clean install on a single disk or dual-boot from a seperate partition on the active drive.
on Oct 27, 2006
boy something happened to my original post. this is supposed to be about installing vista without a DVD....but your answers appear to belong in a different thread? did something get mixed up? The original answers in my thread aren't here anymore.

lol...ok, now my post is not in the thread I posted it in. how fun sorry for the hijack.